Jump to content

Welcome danshan to TGF


Always Call Heads
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am not a modeler but I am pretty sure that is wrong.

the -12 or the idea

 

I think the idea is pretty solid

 

do you think someone can actually model better than the top power ranking places out there right now, I mean they do a pretty darn good job, so this leaves the job of the guy trying to set a line to really just adjust for injuries or wweather or rest or whatever you need to adjust for.

 

I think modeling is quicky becoming a thing of the past. I mean there is not a limit but it would be really hard to model must better than they are doing now. yes quantum computing could possibly do more but that would require more stats than we are getting now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 275
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You are going to lose interest here fast with that danshan. I told you the Think Tank was the place for you. Now if you want to talk about Joe Flacco, you might get some interest. 

 

 

i dont think people will lose interest, i think there are some people who are actually interested in talking modeling and lines, why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the -12 or the idea

 

I think the idea is pretty solid

 

do you think someone can actually model better than the top power ranking places out there right now, I mean they do a pretty darn good job, so this leaves the job of the guy trying to set a line to really just adjust for injuries or wweather or rest or whatever you need to adjust for.

 

I think modeling is quicky becoming a thing of the past. I mean there is not a limit but it would be really hard to model must better than they are doing now. yes quantum computing could possibly do more but that would require more stats than we are getting now.

The idea. Yes, Sagarin numbers will be pretty accurate and will be a basic coinflip on the average. But you are not betting the average. I'd love to be able to bet Sagarin's on college football/

 

Beating professional sports lines is going to be pretty much impossible for that reason but to do it, you will have to be a lot better than Sagarin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the -12 or the idea

 

I think the idea is pretty solid

 

do you think someone can actually model better than the top power ranking places out there right now, I mean they do a pretty darn good job, so this leaves the job of the guy trying to set a line to really just adjust for injuries or wweather or rest or whatever you need to adjust for.

 

I think modeling is quicky becoming a thing of the past. I mean there is not a limit but it would be really hard to model must better than they are doing now. yes quantum computing could possibly do more but that would require more stats than we are getting now.

also the reason the top power ratings do a good job is because they incorporate the line. That is one of their dirty little secrets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea. Yes, Sagarin numbers will be pretty accurate and will be a basic coinflip on the average. But you are not betting the average. I'd love to be able to bet Sagarin's on college football/

 

Beating professional sports lines is going to be pretty much impossible for that reason but to do it, you will have to be a lot better than Sagarin.

Sag is the model and the adjustments are made by the bettor, this is the key, they do the model work and you do the adjustment work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you are going to win by having average numbers and making adjustments. That ain't how it works.

 

the model numbers are the base and you adjust accordingly.  I still fully model and generate my own power rankings but the argument to stop modeling and model adjustments more than the team is becoming popular. Times are changing, the information is there use it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the model numbers are the base and you adjust accordingly.  I still fully model and generate my own power rankings but the argument to stop modeling and model adjustments more than the team is becoming popular. Times are changing, the information is there use it.  

Maybe. I don't think it is going to win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Team SAG SAG MY PR Rockets 92.49 -2.49 -5.83 Warriors 95.81 -5.81 -12.11 Raptors 95.48 -5.48 -7.82 Jazz 92.95 -2.95 -7.78 Trailblazers 93.17 -3.17 -4.82 Nuggets 93.18 -3.18 -6.30 Celtics 95.01 -5.01 -6.77 Thunder 94.04 -4.04 -8.11 Seventysixers 92.78 -2.78 -7.02 Cavaliers 81.7 8.30 7.30 Bucks 97.04 -7.04 -9.87 Wizards 88.39 1.61 -0.41 Spurs 90.85 -0.85 -2.98 Clippers 90.39 -0.39 0.29 Heat 89.35 0.65 -0.27 Timberwolves 91 -1.00 -0.99 Pacers 92.67 -2.67 -3.55 Pelicans 91.19 -1.19 -0.57 Hornets 89.03 0.97 -0.85 Lakers 89.72 0.28 -1.59 Pistons 89.29 0.71 -2.60 Mavericks 88.75 1.25 -1.42 Nets 87.66 2.34 -1.36 Kings 88.85 1.15 -0.75 Magic 89.55 0.45 -1.61 Bulls 84.79 5.21 3.39 Knicks 83.36 6.64 6.41 Hawks 82.44 7.56 2.78 Suns 81.49 8.51 6.17 Grizzlies 87.59 2.41 1.83

 

 

column 2 is sags rating and 3 is mine, you can see how similar they really are

 

now these are power rankings and do not include adjustments for player injuries or rest but the similarity is close enough that using sag would nearly give me the same results on most games. IS sag doing something better than me, I doubt it but its close enough it can save a ton of time and give you more time to focus on the adjustments.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Team SAG SAG MY PR Rockets 92.49 -2.49 -5.83 Warriors 95.81 -5.81 -12.11 Raptors 95.48 -5.48 -7.82 Jazz 92.95 -2.95 -7.78 Trailblazers 93.17 -3.17 -4.82 Nuggets 93.18 -3.18 -6.30 Celtics 95.01 -5.01 -6.77 Thunder 94.04 -4.04 -8.11 Seventysixers 92.78 -2.78 -7.02 Cavaliers 81.7 8.30 7.30 Bucks 97.04 -7.04 -9.87 Wizards 88.39 1.61 -0.41 Spurs 90.85 -0.85 -2.98 Clippers 90.39 -0.39 0.29 Heat 89.35 0.65 -0.27 Timberwolves 91 -1.00 -0.99 Pacers 92.67 -2.67 -3.55 Pelicans 91.19 -1.19 -0.57 Hornets 89.03 0.97 -0.85 Lakers 89.72 0.28 -1.59 Pistons 89.29 0.71 -2.60 Mavericks 88.75 1.25 -1.42 Nets 87.66 2.34 -1.36 Kings 88.85 1.15 -0.75 Magic 89.55 0.45 -1.61 Bulls 84.79 5.21 3.39 Knicks 83.36 6.64 6.41 Hawks 82.44 7.56 2.78 Suns 81.49 8.51 6.17 Grizzlies 87.59 2.41 1.83

 

 

column 2 is sags rating and 3 is mine, you can see how similar they really are

 

now these are power rankings and do not include adjustments for player injuries or rest but the similarity is close enough that using sag would nearly give me the same results on most games. IS sag doing something better than me, I doubt it but its close enough it can save a ton of time and give you more time to focus on the adjustments.  

 

That's fine but you have to be BETTER than the line. You have to be better on the select number of games that you can win and that is not going to happen using Sag numbers unless you have some killer adjustments. You have to have killer numbers and killer adjustments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fine but you have to be BETTER than the line. You have to be better on the select number of games that you can win and that is not going to happen using Sag numbers unless you have some killer adjustments. You have to have killer numbers and killer adjustments.

To beat the NBA this time of year, I find it easier to play on schedule spots. Numbers are just too tight. I don’t play much NBA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Durito actually wrote some interesting stuff but he is another one of the good ol boys, I know everything and I cant listen or waste my so valuable time with people below my level. well folks I might have been at that dumb level but not anymore. I look at most things these jokers right now and just laugh. I spend my time with people that actually know this shit and chat with them not jerkoffs who are just good ol buddies who are living off their antique fame. These guys like this durito bag and ol timer are washed up and long gone. they need to put the keyboard down and go get their jello and nurse call at their retirement homes, the new guys are in town!

Nah just people than can't write.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brilliant.

 

 

yeah I see, no lines, lines before lines come out shows skill.  you dodge duck weave and dive but wont post any lines. Typical 1950s bettor talk.  "I really like quinniapac after a 2 game win streak, I know coach Jones personally, his mom is in the same retirement home I am in" dont get mad durito bag you will get med call soon and shoot if you wait another few days you wont even remember this conversation!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...