mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, IAG said: SPOT ON. +10000000000 And now to top it off I'm somehow a master manipulator who "twists his words" as well as conspiring to "teach him a lesson". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 Just now, RaiseThese said: Who give a fuck what they think and besides I have not been too popular lately so Im sure the usual crew will come in an put their own spin on things later today. Par for the course. Look pedo lover, you wanted me to know what happened so I responded, I really dont care about the money or the loss, nerve did, I counted this a loss after the Conference Playoff games . I already said Im glad for the lesson and it was a cheap one, I just keep responding becuase im amazed at how much a deal YOU and MIke are making out of it. You still owe me money on that trump bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, mikeman said: You still owe me money on that trump bet. Another lie you wanna start? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAG Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Who give a fuck what they think and besides I have not been too popular lately so Im sure the usual crew will come in an put their own spin on things later today. Par for the course. Look pedo lover, you wanted me to know what happened so I responded, I really dont care about the money or the loss, nerve did, I counted this a loss after the Conference Playoff games . I already said Im glad for the lesson and it was a cheap one, I just keep responding becuase im amazed at how much a deal YOU and MIke are making out of it. If you didn’t care, you wouldn’t have asked us to “level the playing field” to “give you a chance.” Oh, don’t give up now commie. #STOPTHECONTESTSTEAL! But I have an appt so I’m out. I think you have sufficiently buried yourself here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 Just now, RaiseThese said: Another lie you wanna start? No, but if your memory is going to be conveniently bad, so can mine, I "think" we bet $500 or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 Just now, IAG said: If you didn’t care, you wouldn’t have asked us to “level the playing field” to “give you a chance.” Oh, don’t give in now commie. #STOPTHECONTESTSTEAL! Nah, just having fun. When I say I dont care Im saying I dont care about the loss spinster. OF course I would have preferred to win but had almost no shot after the conference championships. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, mikeman said: No, but if your memory is going to be conveniently bad, so can mine, I "think" we bet $500 or so. Mike stop the bullshit, we didnt have a bet, you declined remember. Perhaps go through your pms and the thread and then you will be reminded of that fact. You taught me a good lesson though, even if it cost you a potential win. Nice job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, RaiseThese said: Mike stop the bullshit, we didnt have a bet, you declined remember. Perhaps go through your pms and the thread and then you will be reminded of that fact. You taught me a good lesson though, even if it cost you a potential win. Nice job. I'm joking, you sure are uptight sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 6 minutes ago, IAG said: But I have an appt so I’m out. I think you have sufficiently buried yourself here. dont be late for your shift at the commie gloryhole Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 Just now, mikeman said: I'm joking, you sure are uptight sometimes. Yeah right. At least you taught me a lesson, had to pay to do it but not much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 Just now, RaiseThese said: dont be late for your shift at the commie gloryhole Poor form to descend to petty name calling sir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, mikeman said: Poor form to descend to petty name calling sir. Who gives a fuck about your ideas about forum ettiquite? Besides I dont see any name calling SHould have been a preacher instead of a doctor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, RaiseThese said: Who gives a fuck about your ideas about right and wrong ? SHould have been a preacher instead of a doctor Oh yea! I'm sticking my tongue out and thumbing my nose...take that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 Okay I guess I will explain it so my comments make sense and maybe some will learn a little game theory at the same time. Raise fixing to school some folks and like Hines I can claim a gambling professor credit at TGF U Mike claimed that he wanted to make the best decision to win yet he played the game in a manner that didnt give him the best chance to win. How is that? Mike was in first place and picked first and made his pick public instead of private. By picking first he had a 50/50 shot of winning. HE picks right he wins. BUT if he makes his pick private then he increases his odds to maybe 60/40 or better because now there is a chance that IAG or me MIRROR his pick in which case he wins no matter how the game turns out or maybe one mirrors KC and one picks a total that loses, so he has more chances to win this way. But he decided to pick first and takes KC, now IAG in second place has no choice but to pick the opposite because if KC doesnt cover then that means TB does and she wins. It would be stupid to pick anything but Tampa, no use picking a total because that can only cost her, not help her. So the collusion was implicit, Im not suggesting that they got together. It is no different in poker when 2 parties as a matter of proper strategy check down a hand in a tournament in hopes of knocking 3rd player out, it is legal and considered implicit collusion ....whereas if they verbally announced or suggested to each they were going to do it then it is explicit colusion and not allowed. So I make no claim that anyone did anything wrong or illegal. My claim that Mike was teaching me a lesson is that he KNEW by making his pick early and public that IAG had no logical choice but to take the opposite and since I was in third place it would shut me out as no matter who I took one of them would win and have more points than me. Im not mad or upset in the least. So claims to the contrary are completely false. I was simply stating the obvious, Mike made a lower percentage play in order to shut me out rather than making the higher percentage play and make his pick private.. There was nothing that I could do to win so whether I picked first ,last or not at all nothing would have changed. That is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Okay I guess I will explain it so my comments make sense and maybe some will learn a little game theory at the same time. Raise fixing to school some folks and like Hines I can claim a gambling professor credit at TGF U Mike claimed that he wanted to make the best decision to win yet he played the game in a manner that didnt give him the best chance to win. How is that? Mike was in first place and picked first and made his pick public instead of private. By picking first he had a 50/50 shot of winning. HE picks right he wins. BUT if he makes his pick private then he increases his odds to maybe 60/40 or so because now there is a chance that IAG or me MIRROR his pick in which case he wins no matter how the game turns out or maybe one mirrors KC and one picks a total that loses, so he has more chances to win this way. But he decided to pick first and takes KC, now IAG in second place has no choice but to pick the opposite because if KC doesnt cover then that means TB does and she wins. It would be stupid to pick anything but Tampa, no use picking a total because that can only cost her, not help her. So the collusion was implicit, Im not suggesting that they got together. It is no different in poker when 2 parties as a matter of proper strategy check down a hand in a tournament in hopes of knocking 3rd player out, it is legal and considered implicit collusion ....whereas if they verbally announced or suggested to each they were going to do it then it is explicit colusion and not allowed. So I make no claim that anyone did anything wrong or illegal. My claim that Mike was teaching me a lesson is that he KNEW by making his pick early and public that IAG had no logical choice but to take the opposite and since I was in third place it would shut me out as no matter who I took one of them would win and have more points than me. Im not mad or upset in the least. So claims to the contrary are completely false. I was simply stating the obvious, Mike made a lower percentage play in order to shut me out rather than making the higher percentage play and make his pick private.. There was nothing that I could do to win so whether I picked first ,last or not at all nothing would have changed. That is all. The problem is if I pick privately, that is only private for IAG, not you, since I would have PM'd you to make my pick, so you are saying I should have given you an advantage and not her. The fact is I was not concerned with you in any way, she was the competition, not you, I made my pick and I was wrong, I'm fine with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, mikeman said: The problem is if I pick privately, that is only private for IAG, not you, since I would have PM'd you to make my pick, so you are saying I should have given you an advantage and not her. The fact is I was not concerned with you in any way, she was the competition, not you, I made my pick and I was wrong, I'm fine with that. Huh, you would not pm me , you would have sent it to a third party like Jimmy who would release before the game You would have increased your odds of winning, the fact that you claim you dont care doesnt change the fact that you chose lesser odds just like the fact that I said I didnt care about losing change the fact that I could have got home earlier to make a pick. You are really lost today on the logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 11 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Huh, you would not pm me , you would have sent it to a third party like Jimmy who would release before the game You would have increased your odds of winning, the fact that you claim you dont care doesnt change the fact that you chose lesser odds just like the fact that I said I didnt care about losing change the fact that I could have got home earlier to make a pick. You are really lost today on the logic. Cmon, it was your contest, you ran it, you made the rules, I would never have Pm'd anyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, mikeman said: Cmon, it was your contest, you ran it, you made the rules, I would never have Pm'd anyone else. That is on you. That was an option under the rules and you didnt use it. Bottom line is YOU chose a lower percentage play. The reality is that IAG would have taken KC and mirrored you , she would not have won I dont know who I would have taken but I was leaning KC or Over, who knows as I didnt really study since I knew I could not win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeybagadonuts Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 As stated countless times, raise is one dumb motherfucker!!!! Yea Merlin and IAG concluded against you in your poverty contest for less than grocery money. Never change raise. Never put down the moonshine and meth pipe, pal!!! There are far too many commies online you need to show the way to pal!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Hoffa Posted February 17, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 13 hours ago, sleepy said: No need to take the vaccine if your under 70 and in good health The vaccine more deadly than the disease It's something that I need to do so my Mom can get a vaccine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Hoffa Posted February 17, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 My transformation has begun: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 21 minutes ago, Jimmy Hoffa said: It's something that I need to do so my Mom can get a vaccine. You mean they wont give your elderly mom a vaccine unless you get it? That's outrageous.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Hoffa Posted February 17, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, mikeman said: You mean they wont give your elderly mom a vaccine unless you get it? That's outrageous.. I may have worded that poorly. Because we're a 3 generation home it moves her up on the priority list. She's 85 and worried the Covid could do her in... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HRWager Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 37 minutes ago, Jimmy Hoffa said: It's something that I need to do so my Mom can get a vaccine. You`re a lucky guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Losco Posted February 17, 2021 Report Share Posted February 17, 2021 3 hours ago, Jimmy Hoffa said: I may have worded that poorly. Because we're a 3 generation home it moves her up on the priority list. She's 85 and worried the Covid could do her in... how are you higher on the list then her? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.