RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 5 minutes ago, MonkeyF0cker said: As always, when you can't answer a simple question, you try to deflect and reaffirm your stupidity. As always when challenged to face your programming you resort to insults and spinning. Its hard to break free but when you are ready I wlll still be here for you and I wont even say I told you so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 The only thing that's hard to break free is a moron that's so brainwashed that they can't even concede that a NASA engineer claiming that there are challenges of humans going to Mars doesn't mean they're identical for going to the moon. Instead, they post it as proof of something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 4 minutes ago, MonkeyF0cker said: As always, when you can't answer a simple question, you try to deflect and reaffirm your stupidity. I was responding your post and if you can't comprehend that Mars is quite a bit further than the moon which creates far more exposure to cosmic radiation, then you're beyond help. Yup , mars is quite a bit further, like 400 times farther away. if raise is right, and we faked the moon landings, faked the mars landings, then that means all space travel/missions are fake, the jupiter, saturn, neptune, uranus, pluto, mercury, etc, were all fake. Imagine that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 3 minutes ago, mikeman said: Yup , mars is quite a bit further, like 400 times farther away. if raise is right, and we faked the moon landings, faked the mars landings, then that means all space travel/missions are fake, the jupiter, saturn, neptune, uranus, pluto, mercury, etc, were all fake. Imagine that? I'd like to know how he thinks computers were even remotely capable of the renderings of the Earth that came back as pictures from Apollo 11 in 1969. People are so stupid that they think today's technology was always around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Hoffa Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Here on Columbus Day it's ironic to think that some people still feel that the earth is flat... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said: The only thing that's hard to break free is a moron that's so brainwashed that they can't even concede that a NASA engineer claiming that there are challenges of humans going to Mars doesn't mean they're identical for going to the moon. Instead, they post it as proof of something. No , obviously mars is futher but you didnt read the article. Dont pretend like I said it was the same thing. There are still dangers from even sending people the moon, the article is simply there to provide readers additional perspective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 13 minutes ago, mikeman said: Yup , mars is quite a bit further, like 400 times farther away. if raise is right, and we faked the moon landings, faked the mars landings, then that means all space travel/missions are fake, the jupiter, saturn, neptune, uranus, pluto, mercury, etc, were all fake. Imagine that? While I dont agree with your exaggerated conclusions, People will be shocked by what IS fake......if that ever gets declassed that is. BTW your logic is weak......The moon landing could be fake and the other stuff COULD still be real Maybe you can figure out the difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 5 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: No , obviously mars is futher but you didnt read the article. Dont pretend like I said it was the same thing. There are still dangers from even sending people the moon, the article is simply there to provide readers additional perspective. Of course there are dangers. That doesn't mean that they didn't go. JFC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 minute ago, RaiseThese said: While I dont agree with your exaggerated conclusions, People will be shocked by what IS fake......if that ever gets declassed that is. BTW your logic is weak......The moon landing could be fake and the other stuff COULD still be real Maybe you can figure out the difference. This guy knows more than rocket scientists and people who have access to classified information. Simply amazing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 10 minutes ago, MonkeyF0cker said: I'd like to know how he thinks computers were even remotely capable of the renderings of the Earth that came back as pictures from Apollo 11 in 1969. People are so stupid that they think today's technology was always around. Yep , so computers could not render a photo of Earth BUT it could send us on multiple 500k miles back and forth to moon without ever losing one person. Amazing. Good one monkey, now spin your way out of this one .....lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said: This guy knows more than rocket scientists and people who have access to classified information. Simply amazing. Do you take the same approach with doctors and virus/vax scientists? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 5 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Yep , so computers could not render a photo of Earth BUT it could send us on multiple 500k miles back and forth to moon without ever losing one person. Amazing. Good one monkey, now spin your way out of this one .....lol There was television and people knew how to send signals. Rendering realistic graphics is a completely different technology and certainly more advanced than the physics of travel. JFC. Have you possibly noticed how graphics on television, video games, movies, etc. have advanced over the years? But go ahead and tell me that the Star Wars movies from the early 2000's look realistic being some of the most advanced technology around in that era. Then tell me that in 1969, that someone was able to generate images of the Earth that are no different than legitimate images taken from subsequent missions from multiple countries. LOL. I don't know how much more delusional someone can be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 2 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Do you take the same approach with doctors and virus/vax scientists? I use peer-reviewed scientific studies not done by me and actual COVID-19 data to assess those things. Not apples to oranges at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Computer generated in 1969. Uh huh. / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Computer generated in 1969. Sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 1969. Simple shit. Just draw it up on a computer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Nevermind that there weren't monitors around that were capable of even DISPLAYING an image with that sort of resolution back then much less someone rendering it. It's a conspiracy though! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Hoffa Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Just for the record, were the monkeys that we launched prior to the Gemini missions real or fake? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Sorry Monkey .....hahaha You trapped yourself . No spinning out of this foolishness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 minute ago, RaiseThese said: Sorry Monkey .....hahaha You trapped yourself . Yeah. You're totally sane. Seek help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Just now, MonkeyF0cker said: Yeah. You're totally sane. Seek help. Computers cant generate High Quality fake images in 1969 but it can send people on multiple 500k round trip to the moon and back. Sorry Monkey, you cant will them all. Get em next time big feller..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 3 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Computers cant generate High Quality fake images in 1969 but it can send people on multiple 500k round trip to the moon and back. Sorry Monkey, you cant will them all. Get em next time big feller..... God. You are dumb. Your ignorance is appalling. You have no clue how simple the math is for the physics of travel versus realistic computer image rendering. The only checkmate is you proving how fucking retarded you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 2 minutes ago, MonkeyF0cker said: God. You are dumb. Your ignorance is appalling. You have no clue how simple the math is for the physics of travel versus realistic computer image rendering. The only checkmate is you proving how fucking retarded you are. Sorry pal, no amount of name calling or spinng is gonna get you out of this one CHECK the Fuck Mate!!!!!!!!!!! By the way it was YOU who went off on the tangets about photos, pinned yourself into a corner that you could not spin out of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Yup. The Schmidt-Kalman Filter is such a difficult computational problem. Almost like rendering graphics. LOL. You are fucking stupid. Period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 5 minutes ago, MonkeyF0cker said: Yup. The Schmidt-Kalman Filter is such a difficult computational problem. Almost like rendering graphics. LOL. You are fucking stupid. Period. Sorry fella, you just keep digging yourself in deeper. Try next time. You lost just accept it and move on or call me stupid about 100 more times,,lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.fbe36b1d5d7aa4bba4fc6f3b59c0d8b0.gif)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.