Jump to content

Why is it so Hard to teach young Gamblers about...


Sam Odom
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest boatboatboat

I still haven't LEARNED it but I came closer to LEARING it 3 years ago I thing it was.

 

Pats were playing at home vs minny I think and Minny was down to a rookie QB who had never made a start.

 

Line was crazy high..............

 

I bet 1st half and LOST

 

Lost a BUNCH.

 

came close to learning that day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laying big chalk isn't an issue, just as long as your #'s say it should be chalkier. I think it's more of an indictment on a novice bettor's lack of skill to determine a edge or lack there of. Mayweather has been a cash cow at -500 a fight. Granted MLB is quite different, but if my line is -300 and the books are giving me -200 I'll hammer it every time and not think twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know that blindly "staying away from chalk" is very good advice. There IS a reason that team is -200, they are much better than their opponent (or at least much more likely to win in that scenario). Now, does -200 mean they should win EVERY game? No it should mean they win 67% of the time, which of course means they should lose 33% of the time (actually should win less often than that once you adjust for a NVL)

 

It isn't as simple as bet dogs and short favs to make money. There can be situations where you bet a -600 fav and it is a GREAT bet. Not because it won or lost, but if you're data shows that -600 fav should be -900 then over time that's a money maker and a very solid bet. Just like there can be terrible bets made at +200 when in reality maybe they should be closer to +270

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inside story to this thread...

 

Sammy's son bet 100 to win 50 on SanFran yesterday

 

When SF was losing 5-1 he was 'crying' to Sammy :smiley-laughing001:

 

Sammy said - I told you to stay away from laying Big #s

 

SF comes back to win :clap2:

 

Now he is thinking he is SHARP

 

Life goes on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Gambling world...the fish are out there being eaten by the sharks (which are the books) the sharper gamblers are the remora who pick up a scrap or two that the sharks miss. Point is, you need a lot of fish to make the entire ecology work so a few remora can survive.

 

Don't waste time on the fish...fish will be fish...and we need a lot of fish to make it all work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

had a buddy who used to take maddux -300 and pedro -300 everytime they pitched. he said he couldnt pass it up. would put his entire account on it. one afternoon i remember toronto was in town and pedro was like -310. toronto led 4-0 after a few innings and my friend just left. i say his car slowly drive away it was classic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The evil of laying big Chalk... Why does -200 in MLB appear to be a LOCK to sooooooooo many?

 

The old "They are -200 for a reason" is a very strong draw...

 

They also play the games for a reason, that's why I look for live dogs. I try to avoid big chalk in bases, rarely is the price justified.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Without the sheep the bookies would go broke and then no one would have a place to play.... let'em learn on their own.

 

This is flawed thinking imo. You set a good market price and there are sharps on both sides, ala the stock market.

 

Bookies in the -110 sense (hopefully) will be a thing of the past (already are for the huge players)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

had a buddy who used to take maddux -300 and pedro -300 everytime they pitched. he said he couldnt pass it up. would put his entire account on it. one afternoon i remember toronto was in town and pedro was like -310. toronto led 4-0 after a few innings and my friend just left. i say his car slowly drive away it was classic

 

 

pedro martinez's lines were astronomical . remember them well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is flawed thinking imo. You set a good market price and there are sharps on both sides, ala the stock market.

 

Bookies in the -110 sense (hopefully) will be a thing of the past (already are for the huge players)

 

dude, as the market gets sharper, that 4.5% vig becomes a MOUNTAIN. With only sharps, any advantage DISAPPEARS! We need sheep!!!!

 

You think Vegas would be the monster-in-the-desert if only rational folks bet?

 

it's the capitalist/Darwinian system, stupid people get eaten

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...